FortiWeb High Volume Active-Active HA and session pickup

Hello Abdelkrim,

I hope you are doing well :)!

Thank you for using the Community Forum. I will seek to get you an answer or help. We will reply to this thread with an update as soon as possible.

Thanks

Hello Abdelkrim,

We are still looking for someone to help you.

We will come back to you ASAP.

Thanks,

Hi,

In FortiWeb's high volume active-active HA mode, session synchronization (session pickup) is disabled by default. This mode allows each HA member to directly receive and process traffic independently, without relying on a central primary appliance.

To enable session synchronization, which ensures seamless session takeover but increases CPU and bandwidth consumption, you can use the CLI command:

1. Access the FortiWeb CLI.
2. Enter the command: set session-pickup in the system ha configuration.

For more detailed instructions, refer to the FortiWeb CLI Reference.

Hi,

This is what i understand on Active-Active High Volume. I refer to this link: https://docs.fortinet.com/document/fortiweb/8.0.2/administration-guide/815314/high-volume-active-active-ha-mode.

Session pickup is not available in High Volume Active-Active HA mode because of its distinct architectural design compared to the Standard Active-Active mode.

1. No central distributor:

In Standard mode, a primary unit sees all traffic and manages the distribution and session state for the cluster. In High Volume mode, this central management role (which facilitates session tracking and syncing) is removed to eliminate bottlenecks.

2. Independent processing via VIPs:

Because each appliance operates independently and handles its own traffic directly from the network (rather than having it handed off by a primary), there is no centralised session table to sync or pick up.

3. Failover mechanism:

The failover method described in the document is that a "backup appliance assumes the responsibility of handling traffic for the affected virtual IPs." This indicates a network-level failover (moving the VIP) rather than a session-level failover. Since the traffic processing is independent and not centrally distributed, the focus is on maintaining performance and latency rather than maintaining stateful session continuity across different appliances.

Thanks,

Muhaimi

Hi Muhaimi

Thanks for your feedback.

I understand also the same. However I'm still searching for an official response but can't find yet.

And I still hope there is session sync since there are some usage where the sessions are critical.