Skip to main content
Nagram11
New Member
November 18, 2025
Question

Fortigate Policy Order – Malicious Traffic Not Matching First Policy

 

Hello,

I have configured two firewall policies on Fortigate running on 7.2.10,build1706

  1. Policy 1: Blocks all malicious traffic using the Fortigate Internet Service Database.
  2. Policy 2: Allows traffic required to access specific destination public IPs.

The issue I’m facing is that:

  • All traffic matching the destination public IP is hitting Policy 2 directly.
  • Traffic only hits Policy 1 if there is no NAT IP match.

It seems that the destination public IP traffic bypasses the malicious traffic block in Policy 1 and goes straight to Policy 2.

Questions:
• Is this expected Fortigate behavior due to policy order or NAT configuration?
• How can I ensure that malicious traffic is always blocked by Policy 1 before being allowed by Policy 2?
• Do I need to adjust policy sequence, NAT rules, or apply security profiles differently?

Any guidance or best practices would be appreciated.
Thanks in advance!

Below are the details 

vip.srv.LbrUat 198.184.54.58 --> 172.16.28.58
vip.srv.LbrVpn 198.184.54.59 --> 172.16.28.59
vip.srv.lbr 198.184.54.60 --> 172.16.28.60

FGT-Pol.JPG

1 reply

AEK
SuperUser
SuperUser
November 20, 2025
Thought Leadership. Security Summit. Thursday, November 12th, PGA National Resort, Palm Beach Gardens, FL.
Thought Leadership. Security Summit. Thursday, October 8th. Disney's Grand Californian Hotel & SPA, Anaheim, CA.
Security Operations Summit: Modernize SecOps. Operate AI-Native.AMER: November 4 | 9:00 AM PST. India and SAARC: November 5 | 10:00 AM IST. EMEA: November 5 | 10:30 AM CET. APAC: November 5 | 11:00 AM SGT