Skip to main content
FortiCaster
New Member
November 3, 2022
Solved

FG-1100E - missing ports for HW & vLan Switches

  • November 3, 2022
  • 2 replies
  • 1688 views

hello @All

i have a problem with fg-1100E firmware v7.2.2.

when i want to create a hardware or vlan switch, i get sw0 & sw1 offered. so far so good, but why are the ports greater than 28 not included?

i need the QSFP+ port 34 as uplink and at the same time other ports for subordinated switches or special servers. some of them are access ports and others are trunks.

so at the moment i only have the possibility to create a software switch, but unfortunately it does not allow me to differentiate different ports with the same vlan as desired.

i can't even define ports 33 and 34 as dedicated ethernet trunks.

why is this?

thx
jmc

Best answer by gfleming

AFAIK the 1100E does not have a built-in HW Switch. I could be wrong though....

 

https://docs.fortinet.com/document/fortigate/7.2.0/hardware-acceleration/824164/fortigate-1100e-and-1101e-fast-path-architecture

 

So let's go back to the drawing board and figure out what it is you are trying to accomplish.

 

Ideally you should leave switching and such to a dedicated switch on your network. Any traffic that needs to be inspected should be brought up to the FGT using an uplink. That uplink can be a LAG or dedicated port using any of the interfaces on your FGT. The uplink can have VLAN interfaces associated with it for tagging and subnet separation.

 

Creating a software switch is a bad idea as it will prevent you from offloading traffic to the dedicated NPU.

 

 

2 replies

gfleming
Staff
gflemingAnswer
Staff
November 3, 2022

AFAIK the 1100E does not have a built-in HW Switch. I could be wrong though....

 

https://docs.fortinet.com/document/fortigate/7.2.0/hardware-acceleration/824164/fortigate-1100e-and-1101e-fast-path-architecture

 

So let's go back to the drawing board and figure out what it is you are trying to accomplish.

 

Ideally you should leave switching and such to a dedicated switch on your network. Any traffic that needs to be inspected should be brought up to the FGT using an uplink. That uplink can be a LAG or dedicated port using any of the interfaces on your FGT. The uplink can have VLAN interfaces associated with it for tagging and subnet separation.

 

Creating a software switch is a bad idea as it will prevent you from offloading traffic to the dedicated NPU.

 

 

FortiCaster
New Member
November 3, 2022

hello gfleming,

thank you and you are absolutely right. in general i have planned it exactly like that. just assign the 40g as up-&downlink to the fg and ip'd, routes and gw. the whole thing as a cluster and everything is great. works just as wonderful.

the whole reason why i ask this is because i got exactly 2 * 10 gb links to the interconnect modules of a hp c7000. unfortunately the dedicated hpe 5900 has only 4 * 10 gb ports. i just wanted to see if i can get the two links to the fg without having to use another switch.

but as you say this is not a good idea. so back to the beginning and connect another switch.

thank you
jeff

Thought Leadership. Security Summit. Thursday, November 12th, PGA National Resort, Palm Beach Gardens, FL.
Thought Leadership. Security Summit. Thursday, October 8th. Disney's Grand Californian Hotel & SPA, Anaheim, CA.
Security Operations Summit: Modernize SecOps. Operate AI-Native.AMER: November 4 | 9:00 AM PST. India and SAARC: November 5 | 10:00 AM IST. EMEA: November 5 | 10:30 AM CET. APAC: November 5 | 11:00 AM SGT