Skip to main content
gradius85
New Member
April 8, 2019
Question

D500 HA cluster and IP on interface

  • April 8, 2019
  • 3 replies
  • 3511 views

I am trying to understand how to assign IP addresses to firewalls when in HA Cluster. Should I assign IP directly to physical interface or should I create a logical interface? I am looking to run in Active/Passive; however, I find it silly to create a IP on the physical interface, what would get mirror to the other unit. Due to the latter, a logical interface with IP sounds more beneficial.

 

Thank you

 

    3 replies

    ede_pfau
    SuperUser
    SuperUser
    April 8, 2019

    Why silly?

     

    In an a/p cluster, you treat the cluster as ONE machine. All configuration is synched from one member to the other (so you don't have to take care of that).

    That is true for interface addresses as well. As the passive cluster member is not participating in your LANs' traffic the "duplicate" address does not matter.

     

    To use a physical or a logical port (zone?) is up to you. Generally, you have all options available on physical ports, and only a subset on zones.

    gradius85
    gradius85Author
    New Member
    October 18, 2019

    ede_pfau wrote:

    Why silly?

     

    In an a/p cluster, you treat the cluster as ONE machine. All configuration is synched from one member to the other (so you don't have to take care of that).

    That is true for interface addresses as well. As the passive cluster member is not participating in your LANs' traffic the "duplicate" address does not matter.

     

    To use a physical or a logical port (zone?) is up to you. Generally, you have all options available on physical ports, and only a subset on zones.

    This is what I was trying to detail - for what I wanted...

    https://kb.fortinet.com/kb/documentLink.do?externalID=FD34744

     

    ede_pfau
    SuperUser
    SuperUser
    October 18, 2019

    OK, I've read the KB article. This is one way how to manage a cluster. From experience, it's not really common to go into VDOM mode just for mgmt purposes, at least not in the scenarios I've managed.

    Personally, I do not like VDOM mode, I'd only use it if I can't avoid it. As a CLI user, I constantly hop between global, root and xxx VDOM while debugging, and it just steals time.

    Of course, there are valid reasons for using a VDOM (like the need for multiple default routes).

    I get along quite well with mgmt ports alone, actually never needed to receive a slave's logs. YMMV.

    Thought Leadership. Security Summit. Thursday, November 12th, PGA National Resort, Palm Beach Gardens, FL.
    Thought Leadership. Security Summit. Thursday, October 8th. Disney's Grand Californian Hotel & SPA, Anaheim, CA.
    Security Operations Summit: Modernize SecOps. Operate AI-Native.AMER: November 4 | 9:00 AM PST. India and SAARC: November 5 | 10:00 AM IST. EMEA: November 5 | 10:30 AM CET. APAC: November 5 | 11:00 AM SGT