Skip to main content
beingarif
Explorer III
February 3, 2025
Question

FortiSIEM: Multi-Site HA Connectivity & Supervisor Access without Exposing Internal IPs

Version: 7.3.0
Hypervisor: KVM

 

1. Multi-Site HA Configuration (Automatic HA):

We are planning HA with Multi-Site:

Site 1: 2 Supervisors
Site 2: 1 Supervisor

The requirement is to achieve less than 100ms latency for communication between these sites.
Will this communication occur at Layer 2 or Layer 3? Any recommendations on how to establish this connectivity?


2. MSSP Configuration for Supervisor Access:

In an MSSP setup, the customer wants to provide their clients with access to the Supervisors at the Organization level but without exposing their internal IP addresses.
What would be the best approach to achieve this?

6 replies

beingarif
beingarifAuthor
Explorer III
February 4, 2025

hi @Anthony_E looking for some help here..

Anthony_E
Staff
Staff
February 4, 2025

Hi Arif,

 

Let me find a FortiSIEM expert for you :)!

 

Regards,

Best Regards
beingarif
beingarifAuthor
Explorer III
February 5, 2025

@Anthony_E any update on this. can you please help...

Anthony_E
Staff
Staff
February 5, 2025

Hello Arif,

 

Please apologies for the delay. I am still looking for someone to help you.

 

Regards,

Best Regards
Secusaurus
Contributor III
February 5, 2025

Hi @beingarif,

 

1. Multi-Site-HA:

In general, layer 2 or layer 3 does not really matter for your requirement. The latency is not based on the fact if there is a router in the middle, but on the physical distance, the devices in between or on encryption (e.g. because of VPN-tunnels) between the sites. In case you have VPN, routing (layer 3) usually is easier to set up. For HA-setup with a single virtual IP (instead of using a load-balancer in front), layer 2 might be faster in the setup. It very much depends on more aspects than you wrote here and that's the reason why companies like mine or even Fortinet (Professional Services) take money for deeper consulting.

Anyways, the traffic between workers (you did not mention them?) can be very bandwidth-consuming, so you want to avoid any bottle necks there.

 

2. Supervisor access:

I don't quite understand your requirements here. Are you deploying the supervisor(s) on site of the customer or at a central location - meaning: Do all the tenants need to go through the internet to access the supervisor(s) or is it placed on their local network?

In any case, you can do DNAT as you can do with any server.

On the other hand, if you just want to hide IP-addresses on the GUI for tenants, you can look through user roles, there is an option for that.

 

Best,

Christian

NSE8 | Fortinet Advanced MSSP Partner
beingarif
beingarifAuthor
Explorer III
February 5, 2025

Thank-you..!!  @Secusaurus @Anthony_E 
Pretty much clear now..

Thought Leadership. Security Summit. Thursday, November 12th, PGA National Resort, Palm Beach Gardens, FL.
Thought Leadership. Security Summit. Thursday, October 8th. Disney's Grand Californian Hotel & SPA, Anaheim, CA.
Security Operations Summit: Modernize SecOps. Operate AI-Native.AMER: November 4 | 9:00 AM PST. India and SAARC: November 5 | 10:00 AM IST. EMEA: November 5 | 10:30 AM CET. APAC: November 5 | 11:00 AM SGT