Skip to main content
alouvros
Staff
Staff
May 28, 2015

Troubleshooting Tip: Common issue when trying to advertise a subnet to BGP peers

  • May 28, 2015
  • 0 replies
  • 39474 views

Description

This article describes the common issues encountered when trying to advertise a subnet to BGP peers.

Scope

All firmware versions (BGP specific defined by the RFC 4271).

Solution

The BGP network command has a different use compared to the network command used by IGPs. This command is not used to enable BGP on interfaces (as a matter of fact, there is no such concept in BGP, as there is in IGPs), but it is used to inject routes from the routing table to the BGP table so they can be advertised to BGP peers. For this to happen, an exact route for the prefix that needs to be advertised should be installed in the routing table on the BGP-speaking router.

A very common mistake, while configuring such a scenario, is when the BGP network command does not reference the exact prefix for a route which is installed in the routing table, or such a route to this prefix is not installed in the routing table, at all.

The BGP network command must reference the exact prefix for which a route is currently installed in the routing table of the BGP-speaking router. When such a route for the exact prefix is not installed in the routing table, a workaround is to use a black hole route (outgoing interface null0, in other Vendors context) to this prefix. This way, the route in question will be installed in the routing table, and it will be injected into the BGP table and advertised to BGP peers.

CLI configuration:

config router bgp
    config network
        edit 0
            set prefix 10.0.0.0/8
        end
    end


config router static
    edit 0
        set blackhole enable
        set dst 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0
    next
end


Caution: Size the blackhole route to match the advertised prefix exactly, not broader. A wider blackhole can silently drop traffic for real subnets that fall inside it. More-specific real routes still win on longest-prefix-match, but only if they are actually present and correctly installed.

Verification of configuration and troubleshooting:

 

Routing Table

get router info routing-table all

RIB

get router info routing-table database

FIB (kernel routing table)

get router info kernel or diagnose ip route list

Routing Cache

diagnose ip rtcache list

BGP config

get router bgp

BGP info for networks

get router info bgp network

 

If the route exists but the peer still does not see it:

This is the second most common follow-up issue. Work through these in order:

  • Confirm BGP itself sees it as a candidate: get router info bgp network

  • Confirm it is actually being sent to the specific peer: get router info bgp neighbors <peer-ip> advertised-routes

  • Check for an outbound route-map, prefix-list, or distribute-list on that neighbor filtering it out, a very common second-order cause. Look under 'config neighbor <ip>' for 'set route-map-out', and check the referenced config router route-map / prefix-list objects.

  • Confirm the config change actually took effect: 'execute router clear bgp ip <peer-ip> soft out' (preferred, no session reset) or 'execute router clear bgp ip <peer-ip>' (full reset for that neighbor).


Related article:

Technical Tip: Advertise a BGP route not present in the routing table using network-import-check

    Thought Leadership Security Summit. Outpace New Threats with AI - enhanced defense. Tuesday, Septmeber 15, 8:30 AM - 2:30 PM PT. The Golf Club at Newcastle, WA.
    Virtual event | September 2026. SASE summit. The age of autonomous trust. Register here!